<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;King Richard II&#8221; by Shakespeare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.girldetective.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.girldetective.net/?p=1782</link>
	<description>Reading, Writing, Movies and Mothering in Minneapolis, Mostly</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 21:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: girldetective</title>
		<link>http://www.girldetective.net/?p=1782&cpage=1#comment-16384</link>
		<dc:creator>girldetective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 04:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.girldetective.net/?p=1782#comment-16384</guid>
		<description>I have gone with Arden, because my well-educated and dear friend Thalia recommended them to me in grad school. I find they're at least as good as the other individual issues. From the research I've done, there is no one series that folks agree on, but Arden is usually one mentioned, as is the Riverview anthology. I've tried the new Folger editions of a few plays last year. They seemed fine: I liked the covers, they were available in a nice portably mass-market size, and the notes were geared to the meaning of the text rather than the history of the play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have gone with Arden, because my well-educated and dear friend Thalia recommended them to me in grad school. I find they&#8217;re at least as good as the other individual issues. From the research I&#8217;ve done, there is no one series that folks agree on, but Arden is usually one mentioned, as is the Riverview anthology. I&#8217;ve tried the new Folger editions of a few plays last year. They seemed fine: I liked the covers, they were available in a nice portably mass-market size, and the notes were geared to the meaning of the text rather than the history of the play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://www.girldetective.net/?p=1782&cpage=1#comment-16367</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.girldetective.net/?p=1782#comment-16367</guid>
		<description>I actually haven't read ANY of Shakespeare's "King" tragedies.  But it is my fondest hope to one day have a complete collection of his hopes, preferably with each play housed in its own individual volume.  Those "complete works in a single book" jobs are just far too unwieldy (with for too tiny type) for me!

Do you tend to prefer the Arden Shakespeare editions, or was this selection occur without any premeditation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually haven&#8217;t read ANY of Shakespeare&#8217;s &#8220;King&#8221; tragedies.  But it is my fondest hope to one day have a complete collection of his hopes, preferably with each play housed in its own individual volume.  Those &#8220;complete works in a single book&#8221; jobs are just far too unwieldy (with for too tiny type) for me!</p>
<p>Do you tend to prefer the Arden Shakespeare editions, or was this selection occur without any premeditation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
