<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jonathan Strange &#038; Mr. Norrell by Susannah Clarke</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.girldetective.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.girldetective.net/?p=486</link>
	<description>Reading, Writing, Movies and Mothering in Minneapolis, Mostly</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 19:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: girldetective</title>
		<link>http://www.girldetective.net/?p=486&cpage=1#comment-4858</link>
		<dc:creator>girldetective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 22:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.girldetective.net/?p=486#comment-4858</guid>
		<description>For the library, I've started sending myself emails then filing them in a recommended folder so that I'm not overloading my request queue all the time, plus allowing myself to have a go at the home bookshelf. I think I calculated once that I could read one book a week, and still not finish the books I own that I haven't read. I think perhaps a two to four year plan might be prudent. I wonder if it's even possible  not to own more books than one is able to read.

So far, this year's list is evenly split with 4 books each that:

1. I read for the first time and have owned for a while (up to eight years)
2. I read for the first time that I purchased recently
3. I re-read and owned
4. I got from the library (3) and was given (1)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the library, I&#8217;ve started sending myself emails then filing them in a recommended folder so that I&#8217;m not overloading my request queue all the time, plus allowing myself to have a go at the home bookshelf. I think I calculated once that I could read one book a week, and still not finish the books I own that I haven&#8217;t read. I think perhaps a two to four year plan might be prudent. I wonder if it&#8217;s even possible  not to own more books than one is able to read.</p>
<p>So far, this year&#8217;s list is evenly split with 4 books each that:</p>
<p>1. I read for the first time and have owned for a while (up to eight years)<br />
2. I read for the first time that I purchased recently<br />
3. I re-read and owned<br />
4. I got from the library (3) and was given (1)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loretta</title>
		<link>http://www.girldetective.net/?p=486&cpage=1#comment-4855</link>
		<dc:creator>Loretta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 21:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.girldetective.net/?p=486#comment-4855</guid>
		<description>I just missed getting this at our local op shop last week - it was 50 cents! - but some old bloke just got it before me. I assumed it was a sign that I wasn't meant to read it, but maybe I should?
I have the same readolution this year: to read more books I own, you're very strong sticking to your guns. The siren song of the library is too big a lure for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just missed getting this at our local op shop last week - it was 50 cents! - but some old bloke just got it before me. I assumed it was a sign that I wasn&#8217;t meant to read it, but maybe I should?<br />
I have the same readolution this year: to read more books I own, you&#8217;re very strong sticking to your guns. The siren song of the library is too big a lure for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
