The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao by Junot Diaz

April 11th, 2008

The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao by Junot Diaz is very good. It won the National Book Critics Circle Award, the Morning News Tournament of Books, and the Pulitzer.

Oscar is a pudgy social outcast whose family came from the Dominican Republic. In short segments, we learn about him, his sister Lola, his mother, and finally, about the narrator Yunior and his relationship to the family. Theirs is an immigrant story, about the old world and the new, told in a unique snappy, geeky, Spanish-slang-filled patois. Is the family’s string of tragedies a curse, “fuku”, or is their survival good fortune? Is it just life?

The world is full of tragedies enough without niggers having to resort to curses for explanations.

That’s Yunior’s take at one point, though he wavers. What the reader thinks is left open. There are passages of magical realism, of unbelievable survival, of astonishing love. This book reminded me of Middlesex because of its old/new world ancestral histories, and of Michael Chabon’s Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay because of its brazen comic-book and sci-fi/fantasy geek love. My only regret is that I was whisked out of each character’s life just as I got deeply into their story.

Literary Deal Breakers, and Makers

April 9th, 2008

Rachel Donadio’s recent back page essay in the NYT book section on literary deal breakers got a lot of comments, and a lot of linkage.

Anyone who cares about books has at some point confronted the Pushkin problem: when a missed – or misguided – literary reference makes it chillingly clear that a romance is going nowhere fast. At least since Dante’s Paolo and Francesca fell in love over tales of Lancelot, literary taste has been a good shorthand for gauging compatibility.

Like most bookish bloggers, I could rattle off books or authors that make me cringe. It’s too easy, though, and really, too potentially offensive. As soon as I say I hate x, someone else would say they loved it, or at least didn’t hate it.

More fun, I think, are literary dealMAKERs. My friend LXN worked in a bookstore, and when my soon-to-be friend Thalia asked if they had any Diana Wynne Jones, they bonded about Dogsbody, and Thalia got invited to a potluck at LXN’s. At that party, Thalia and I both saw the list of books for LXN’s book group, and asked to join. On my first date with now-husband G. Grod, he saw Watchmen and Sandman graphic novels on my shelf, and knew we were off to a promising start.

So the question I put to you is, what have been literary dealmakers for you, in friendship or in love?

Housewifery, Then and Now

April 9th, 2008

One of the things I find fascinating about AMC’s show, Mad Men, is the care they take to portray 1960, in costume, set and script.

She’s filled with petty jealousies, and overwhelmed by daily tasks. Not to worry, we see this a lot in housewives. –Betty Draper’s psychiatrist, reporting back to the husband.

Petty and overwhelmed? That describes me on more days than I’d like. At least patient/doctor confidentiality is better after fifty years.

The season finale of Mad Men is re-airing late Sunday night. It’s also on iTunes, and out on DVD July 1, 2008.

Sense and Sensibility (2008)

April 7th, 2008

The PBS Complete Jane Austen finished Sunday with the second part of a new, 3-hour adaptation of Sense and Sensibility. Much stronger than the other new adaptations of Persuasion, Mansfield Park and Northanger Abbey, SS08 benefited from its extra 90 minutes of screen time. It was able to do justice to the story and to characters that the other, shorter adaptations simply couldn’t manage. It does, though, have the tough circumstance of comparison to both the popular book and Ang Lee’s popular 1995 film adaptation.

SS08 opens shockingly, with a steamy love scene. Outraged, I thought, “That’s not in the book; they’re sexing this up on purpose!” A few seconds later I recalled who the couple must be, and that this scene WAS part of the book, though not told in present-tense detail. Interesting, I thought, but pointless to all who have read the story, and even all who are somewhat familiar with Austen’s books, which all include an initially charming guy who turns out to be a cad; in SS it’s Willoughby. And Willoughby, in this new adaptation, is so obviously oily and up to no good that it’s a mystery why Marianne falls for him, and why no one else suspects him.

I’ll skip to what I liked first. Hattie Morahan was absolutely wonderful as Elinor. Sympathetic, believable, vulnerable, and strong. David Morrissey as Colonel Brandon was likewise quite good. He ably captured the quiet, steadfast, tormented older man who’s had his heart broken, and has no pretty illusions.

I’d forgotten why SS was my least favorite Austen novel, and in a well-drawn but painful sequence SS08 reminded me why. Marianne, while often foolish and trying, is talented and spirited. After she is dumped by Willoughby and rescued by Brandon, she slowly grows to love the latter. For all his upright nice-guy-ness, though, Brandon is nearly twenty years her senior, and he’ll have a muffling effect on her exuberance. SS08 captured this in a scene where Marianne enters his dark library, sits down at the pianoforte, wipes a hand across the top–affection, or dusting?–and proceeds to play a slow, dark tune in minor key. The interior scene is interpolated with one of her going outside to see Brandon, who has unhooded his hawk, set it “free” to fly, then called it back and snared its feet. In the book, Austen attempts to gloss over their differences by saying that they will be good for one another, but I think some of bright, dynamic Marianne will be lost forever in that safe, stable marriage. That may have been Austen’s point, but it doesn’t endear the story to me.

My other reservations about SS08 are minor, but they accumulated. The mother’s character is muddy–instead of foolish like Marianne she comes off as merely stupid. Dan Stevens as Edward Ferrars seems to be doing an impression of Hugh Grant from the ‘96 film. Likewise Claire Skinner as Fanny Ferrars Dashwood seems to be doing a Miranda Richardson impression. There’s far too little of Mr. Palmer, and I missed his snarky comments. There were far too many moody shots of water crashing on rocky shores. And, as with the other new adaptations, WHY OH WHY the shaky, hand-held camera? That’s gotten tired in action movies; there’s absolutely no call for it in Victorian England!

At the end, I found it a mixed bag. Some excellent things, some good things, several bad things. Worth watching on television, but I would not buy the DVD. For more commentary, see Austenblog, and Maureen Ryan’s The Watcher.

Real Food at The Kitchn and Bitten

April 6th, 2008

The Kitchn is the dangerous food blog at dangerously cool Apartment Therapy, the site that featured those bookshelf stairs a few weeks ago. AT is dangerous because it shows all kinds of cool, covetable thing that I can’t afford. Kitchn is dangerous because it’s like foodie Alice down the rabbit hole–I see one recipe I like, then they link to another, and on and on. I only wish they had a good print feature for the recipes so I don’t have to cut and paste them into Open Office. Bonus points, as if needed, for their incisive recaps of Top Chef Chicago.

Bitten, on the other hand, at the NYT, has a very handy print feature. It’s the blog of Mark Bittman, patron cook of simple good food and a very knowledgeable commenting audience.

Meg Wolitzer, on “The Ten-Year Nap”

April 5th, 2008

Also, raised as I was by a feminist mother, on Ms. magazine, the sense that you can have it all was instilled in all of us — and I’m really glad that it was. But when motherhood pulls you in one direction, and work pulls you in another, that sense becomes diluted. Somebody said to me long ago that it’s not a question of having it all, but that you can have a lot of most things. That’s a nice way to think about it. Think about if your life is going in the direction you want it to go, and try not to be riddled with self-doubt.

(interview link from Bookslut)

Wolitzer’s new book is a fictional take on the work/home mommy debate, set in NYC. It’s gotten a good review at EW, and at Mental Multivitamin. I keep saying I’m going to get back to my home book shelves, but there’s too much that tempts me, like this.

“This is an awareness test”

April 5th, 2008

Do the test” (link thanks to Boing Boing) is part of a safety campaign in London. It highlights something called “change blindness” which was also in the NYT science section last week.

Funny and disturbing.

What the Pigeon Wants Is…

April 4th, 2008

Last November, children’s book author/illustrator extraordinaire Mo Willems announced that he was writing a new Pigeon book, and that the title began, “The Pigeon Wants A…” School kids were invited to write in with their guesses. The publisher received over 13,000 replies; many schoolteachers galvanized their classes for group replies. (Links thanks to ALoTT5MA)

Well, April 1 was the announcement date. Here is what the Pigeon wants. Unfortunately, it may be what my son, 4yo Drake, wants too.

We’ll get the book. Not the other thing, though.

Nick and Eddie, Minneapolis, MN, “Snapshot” Review

April 4th, 2008

Third time’s a charm–my husband G. Grod and I FINALLY made it out to dinner to celebrate our birthdays from last month. We’d had to cancel the sitter twice due to the kids being sick, then our sitter went on Spring Break and, voila, a month had passed.

Nick and Eddie
was my first choice based on recent good reviews in City Pages and Minnesota Monthly, which is the new host of my favorite local food writer, Dara Moskowitz Grumdahl.

Loved: Our quiet table in a nook. One of the two breads–the lighter, sweeter one. G. Grod’s spicy steak entree over mashed potatoes and collard greens. My poached salmon. (While the potatoes with it weren’t done, the server was very nice about it, and comped my dessert.) Both our desserts: my butterscotch pudding, his chocolate roll up. The friendly, attentive but not intrusive service.

Liked: My pate appetizer, borscht, and the other, denser bread.

Regrets: Cold butter tore up the very good bread. I had to warm it over the candle. And I was very sad to choose between the butterscotch pudding and the spice cake, so I’ll have to go again and get that dessert.

Overall, good service, good meal, fabulous desserts.

Spoonriver “Snapshot” Review

April 4th, 2008

I finally made it to Spoonriver, the newer restaurant of Minneapolis foodie legend, and genuinely nice person, Brenda Langton. A friend and I chose it over Cue before seeing Jane Eyre at the Guthrie.

Loved: The mushroom terrine appetizer–perfect for a winter evening. The beet ravioli with braised kale. Getting my veggies was a delight.

Liked: My friend’s special of a butternut squash enchilada was too heavily spiced for me, but the accompanying slaw was delicious and cool.

Regrets: We ran out of toasts before we ran out of terrine, and we ran out of time before we could order dessert.

Next time I’ll make time for dessert. And there will be a next time. Spoonriver was lovely.

If Only!

April 4th, 2008

My no-longer-baby Guppy has decidedly entered his terrible twos. He’s still sweet and good natured, so things are not so much terrible as trying. Yesterday I had to chase him down to get him dressed, as he wouldn’t come to me. I finally got him up in a bear hug.

He turned to me with his frowny face, the one that always makes me laugh, and said, “Have some consideration, Mommy!” (A phrase he parrots of his older brother, 4yo Drake, who gleaned it from a story in George and Martha Round and Round. I think they think it means “Stop bothering me!”)

Drake, overhearing this, called out, “Mom doesn’t need consideration!”

Well, “needs” and “gets” are two very different things.

Battlestar Galactica: What the Frak is Going On?

April 4th, 2008

I’m sure all you geeks know that Battlestar Galactica returns tonight for the first part of its last season, number 4. There is a funny, helpful video at Scifi.com called What the Frak is Going On, to help remind us of what’s gone before, since it’s been so frakkin’ long. The video is 8 minutes, but fast paced and well worth watching. It reminded me of why I’ve loved the show, and still have hope for a strong last season.

Wait, Let Me Rephrase That

April 3rd, 2008

A few things I’ve said to the kids that didn’t come out right the first time:

“Toilet paper isn’t a toy…um…toilet paper isn’t for playing with.”

“Hammers aren’t for hitting…um…hammers aren’t for hitting PEOPLE.”

Me: Markers are for drawing on paper, not yourself. Why did you do that?

4yo Drake: To make myself pretty.

Me: Drawing on yourself doesn’t make you pretty.

Drake: But, Mom, you draw on yourself with blush and eyeliner.

Me: Um, well, you’re right. But those are for the face. Markers are still for paper. PAPER.

Added fifteen minutes later, when I went to check on strange noises coming from the TV room.

Me: Drake, what are you doing?

Drake: Mom, NOTHING! (Points to the cars lined up in front of the VCR.) It’s the CARS. They’re telling the orange one to come out. She shouldn’t be in there.

Me: (Deep breath) The cars are right. She shouldn’t be in the VCR. She could break it, or get lost. (Pointing at one of the cars) Guido, please tell the orange car to come out.

The Girl Detective Army

April 2nd, 2008

Nancy Drew Spider Sapphire cover
My friend Duff sent me a link to The Girl Detective, which is much more political than mine. In addition to the pseudonym, we both run WordPress, have both read Scott Pilgrim volume 4, and I’m currently reading The Brief, Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao (thanks, Amy!), which she recently finished. There’s also Girl-Detective, the home of mystery author Diana Killian, fan of vintage crime fiction and films, both of which I only dabble in.

Seeing these other Girl Detectives sent me to my shelf for Kelly Link’s excellent story collection, Stranger Things Happen, which contains the short story, “The Girl Detective”. I thought this excerpt captured what I think is cool about there being multiple Girl Detective sites:

Some people say that she is not one girl but many–that is, she’s actually a secret society of Girl Scouts. Or possibly a sub-branch of the FBI

Vivent les Girl Detectives!

The Shadow Catcher by Marianne Wiggins

April 2nd, 2008

Yet another book from 2007 that I discovered through the Morning News Tournament of Books was Marianne Wiggins’s Shadow Catcher. It won its first and second matches, but lost in the semis to the juggernaut Oscar Wao.

The Shadow Catcher is a postmodern novel, intermixing photography, biography, autobiography, fact and fiction.

How the average person dreams is how the average novelist puts a page together. Random bits of seen material float in, dismembered parts of memories, skeins of information knit and shred in contrast to their logic.

The narrator is a woman named Marianne Wiggins, who meets with movie studio execs to discuss a project on Edward S. Curtis, who famously photographed Native Americans in the early 20th century. The character of Wiggins wrote a novel on Curtis, and their stories become strangely intertwined when Wiggins drives out to Vegas to see a man identified as her father, who committed suicide decades ago. At a few points I felt it was over my head. I didn’t doubt the skill of the author, but rather my skill as a reader. Uneasy at times, but also fascinating, towards the end I raced to finish it and find out what happened.

Becoming Jane (2007)

April 1st, 2008

I went back and forth on whether to watch Becoming Jane. If I could advise my past self, I would say to skip it. I find Jane Austen’s six complete novels well written and engaging; they draw me through from beginning to end and keep my interest. Alas, I can’t say the same for this piece of historical fiction. The movie about the woman who wrote such timeless books, and her own possible romantic entanglements, manages to be quite dull. There are some good points, especially a scene between Jane and her mother, but overall this was a poorly done pastiche, with a little of Austen’s life, a little of her plot points, and a lot of made up stuff. Austenblog has a thorough and very fair review of the DVD. I think Becoming Jane was interesting to contrast with the recent PBS Miss Austen Regrets, which looked at the same themes and characters from the end of Austen’s life. In my opinion, it was the better film of the two, though not perfect, either.

Out Like a Lamb, My A$$

March 31st, 2008

It’s March 31st
Heavy, wet snow inches up
When will we see spring?

Emma (1996) (TV)

March 31st, 2008

After my recent disappointment with the adaptation of the Guthrie’s Jane Eyre, I found the 1996 Emma, made for television, a pleasant surprise. I remember the Paltrow Emma as uneven, but I thought this version was paced well. I appreciated its depiction of class and living conditions. Beckinsale was convincing and girlish in the title role, and looked much more normal than what she’s morphed into over the years. There were several strong supporting performances: Mark Strong as Mr. Knightley (who I’ve seen and enjoyed recently in Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day, and Stardust), Lucy Morrison as Mrs. Elton, Samantha Morton as Harriet Smith, and particularly Olivia Williams as Jane Fairfax. The adaptation hewed closely to the novel; that, along with the casting, were what made it so enjoyable for me.

And the Rooster Goes to…

March 31st, 2008

The Morning News announces the winner of The Tournament of Books. It’s one I haven’t gotten to yet, though on deck after Marianne Wiggins’s Shadow Catcher, which is at bat. The tournament, the judging and the commentary were lots of fun, and I’ve really enjoyed the books I’ve read because of it, and look forward to the ones I haven’t got to yet.

Sweet Escapism at the Parkway

March 31st, 2008

Twin Citians, we deserve a sweet escape from this dreadful weather. The new series from TakeUp, screwball romantic comedies from the depression, starts tonight at the Parkway. The snow will prevent me from going tonight, but those of you who are closer might check out Easy Living, which I’ve not seen.